Are film studios way too aggressive in marketing PG-13 films to kids of all ages?
That’s what the Los Angeles Times wondered yesterday. Sure, no one’s directly pitching extremely violent movies to elementary school-age kids…but advertising licensed toys and snacks may be effective enough.
Explains LA Times writer John Horn:
So if your 4-year-old suddenly says he has to see “The Incredible Hulk” — rated PG-13 in part for “sequences of intense action violence” and “some frightening sci-fi images” — it could be that he’s seen a Hulk Airheads candy spot running in the middle of the morning on Cartoon Network’s “Robotboy.”
(Yes, that ad does include a clip from the movie.)
Another nice quote from the piece:
“Parents say, ‘I thought, “How bad could [the movie] be because they have all these toys?”‘” says Susan Linn of the Campaign for a Commerical-Free Childhood. “And then they take their 5-year-old to ‘Iron Man,’ and there are extended scenes of torture.”
Personally, there’s no way we would take a 5-year-old to see Iron Man, toys or no toys, but that’s beside the point.
Who has the power to make sure kids’ ads contain age-appropriate content and air at the “right” times? It’s the usual regulatory mess — the FTC, some trade group called the Children’s Advertising Review Unit, and the Motion Picture Association of America which, according to Horn’s article, seems annoyed with all the complaints.
It’s a fascinating article. Check it out. Just remember to watch live TV with one finger on the fast forward button.
Home
Have a toddler who just can’t stop singing "Wheels on the Bus?" Chag Holland, who writes about being a stay-at-home dad of two at 
